ABSTRACT
Objectives: The aim was to compare the incidence of Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia in COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 adult patients during the pandemic period versus the previous two years. Also, we described the characteristics of both cohorts of patients in pandemic period to find differences. Material and methods: Retrospective study in our tertiary-care centre reviewing S. aureus bacteremia episodes in COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 patients through clinical records and the Microbiology Department database. Results: In 2018 and 2019, the incidence of S. aureus bacteremia episodes was 1.95 and 1.63 per 1000 admissions respectively. In the pandemic period, global incidence was 1.96 episodes per 1000 non-COVID-19 admissions and 10.59 episodes per 1000 COVID-19 admissions. A total of 241 bacteremia was registered during this pandemic period in 74 COVID-19 patients and in 167 non-COVID-19 patients. Methicillin resistance was detected in 32.4% and 13.8% of isolates from COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 patients respectively. In COVID-19 patients, mortality rates were significantly higher. Conclusions: We showed a significantly high rates of S. aureus bacteremia incidence in COVID-19 patients and higher methicillin resistance and 15-day mortality rates than in non-COVID-19 patients.
Objetivos: Comparar la incidencia de bacteriemias por Staphylococcus aureus en pacientes adultos COVID-19 y no-COVID-19 durante la pandemia frente a los 2 años previos. Además, describimos las características de ambas cohortes en periodo pandémico para encontrar diferencias. Material y métodos: Estudio retrospectivo en nuestro centro de tercer nivel a través de historias clínicas y la base de datos del Servicio de Microbiología. Resultados: En 2018 y 2019, la incidencia de bacteriemias fue de 1.95 y 1,63 casos por cada 1.000 ingresos respectivamente. En pandemia, la incidencia global fue de 1,96 casos por cada 1.000 ingresos no-COVID-19 y de 10,59 casos por cada 1.000 ingresos COVID-19. Durante la pandemia se registraron 241 bacteriemias en 74 pacientes COVID-19 y en 167 pacientes no-COVID-19. La resistencia a meticilina se detectó en el 32,4 y 13,8% de los aislados de pacientes COVID-19 y no-COVID-19 respectivamente. En pacientes COVID-19 la mortalidad fue significativamente mayor. Conclusiones: Mostramos una incidencia significativamente alta de bacteriemias por S. aureus en pacientes COVID-19, así como mayores tasas de resistencia a meticilina y mortalidad a los 15 días que en pacientes no-COVID-19.
ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: COVID-19 associated pulmonary aspergillosis (CAPA) is a new clinical entity linked to SARS-CoV-2 infection that is causing a rise on the risk of complications and mortality, particularly in critical patients. METHODS: We compared diagnostic and clinical features in two cohorts of patients with severe COVID-19 admitted in the intensive care units (ICU) of two different hospitals in Madrid, Spain, between February and June 2021. Clinical and microbiological relevant aspects for CAPA diagnosis were collected for further classification. CAPA was classified as colonization, possible, probable, proven, and tracheobronchial aspergillosis according to the ECMM/ISHAM consensus, with some modifications to consider tracheobronchial aspirate as sample comparable to non-bronchoscopic lavages (NBL). RESULTS: 56 patients admitted in HULP (Hospital Universitario La Paz) ICU and 61 patients admitted in HEEIZ (Hospital de Emergencias Isabel Zendal) ICU had clinical suspicion of invasive fungal disease in the context of COVID-19 infection. Cultures were positive for Aspergillus spp. in 32 patients. According to 2020 European Confederation of Medical Mycology and the International Society for Human and Animal Mycology (ECMM/ISHAM) consensus, 11 patients were diagnosed with possible CAPA and 10 patients with probable CAPA. Global incidence for CAPA was 6.3%. Global median days between ICU admission and diagnosis was 14 day. Aspergillus fumigatus complex was the main isolated species. Antifungal therapy was used in 75% of patients with CAPA suspicion, with inter-hospital differences in the administered antifungals. Global overall mortality rate for CAPA patients was 66.6% (14/21). All-cause mortality in non-CAPA cohorts were of 26.3% in HULP group (34/129) and 56.8% (104/183) in HEEIZ group. CONCLUSIONS: There were no significant differences in incidence between the two hospitals, and differences in antifungal therapy did not correlate with differences in mortality, reflecting that both first-line azoles and Amphotericin B could be effective in treating CAPA infections, according to the current guideline indications.
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study is to review how did the first three COVID-19 waves affected the diagnostic of tuberculosis and to describe the extra-pulmonary Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex (TB) diagnosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective observational study was done during the first three waves of pandemic to ascertain the impact on TB samples and to recover the extra-pulmonary TB cases we included the first two years of COVID-19. All relevant data was recovered from hospital and Clinical Microbiology records. RESULTS: Prepandemic period showed an average of 44 samples per week for TB study; during the first three waves this number dropped to 23.1 per week. A reduction of 67.7% of pulmonary TB diagnosis was observed and an increase of 33.3% diagnosis of extra-pulmonary TB was noted when comparing pre-pandemic and pandemic period. DISCUSSION: The number of declared cases and samples for TB diagnosis dropped during the first three COVID-19 waves due to the overstretched Public Health System which could lead to a delay in diagnosis, treatment and to the spread of TB disease in the general population. Surveillance programs should be reinforced to avoid this.
ABSTRACT
Introduction: Surveillance of Candida species isolates from blood cultures (BCs) in Europe is considered fragmented, unable to allow the definition of targets of antifungal stewardship recommendations especially during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. Methods: We performed a multicentric retrospective study including all consecutive BC Candida isolates from six Southern European tertiary hospitals (1st January 2020 to 31st December 2021). Etiology, antifungal susceptibility patterns, and clinical setting were analyzed and compared. Results: C. albicans was the dominant species (45.1%), while C. auris was undetected. Candida species positive BC events increased significantly in COVID-19 ICUs in 2021 but decreased in other ICUs. Resistance to azole increased significantly and remained very high in C. albicans (fluconazole from 0.7% to 4.5%, p = 0.03) and C. parapsilosis complex (fluconazole up to 24.5% and voriconazole up to 8.9%), respectively. Resistance to caspofungin was remarkable in C. tropicalis (10%) and C. krusei (20%), while resistance to at least one echinocandin increased in 2021, especially in C. parapsilosis complex (from 0.8% to 5.1%, p = 0.05). Although no significant differences were observed over the study period, fluconazole and echinocandin resistance increased in COVID-19 ICUs by up to 14% and 5.8%, respectively, but remained undetected in non-intensive COVID-19 wards. Conclusions: Antifungal stewardship activities aimed at monitoring resistance to echinocandin in C. tropicalis and C. krusei, and against the spread of fluconazole resistant C. parapsilosis complex isolates are highly desirable. In COVID-19 patients, antifungal resistance was mostly present when the illness had a critical course.
ABSTRACT
Introduction The aim of this study is to review how did the first three COVID-19 waves affected the diagnostic of tuberculosis and to describe the extra-pulmonary Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex (TB) diagnosis. Materials and methods A retrospective observational study was done during the first three waves of pandemic to ascertain the impact on TB samples and to recover the extra-pulmonary TB cases we included the first two years of COVID-19. All relevant data was recovered from hospital and Clinical Microbiology records. Results Prepandemic period showed an average of 44 samples per week for TB study;during the first three waves this number dropped to 23.1 per week. A reduction of 67.7% of pulmonary TB diagnosis was observed and an increase of 33.3% diagnosis of extra-pulmonary TB was noted when comparing pre-pandemic and pandemic period. Discussion The number of declared cases and samples for TB diagnosis dropped during the first three COVID-19 waves due to the overstretched Public Health System which could lead to a delay in diagnosis, treatment and to the spread of TB disease in the general population. Surveillance programs should be reinforced to avoid this.
ABSTRACT
Objetivos: Comparar la incidencia de bacteriemias por Staphylococcus aureus en pacientes adultos COVID-19 y no-COVID-19 durante la pandemia frente a los dos años previos. Además, describimos las características de ambas cohortes en periodo pandémico para encontrar diferencias. Material y métodos: Estudio retrospectivo en nuestro centro de tercer nivel a través de historias clínicas y la base de datos del Servicio de Microbiología. Resultados: En 2018 y 2019, la incidencia de bacteriemias fue de 1,95 y 1,63 casos por 1.000 ingresos respectivamente. En pandemia, la incidencia global fue de 1,96 casos por 1.000 ingresos no-COVID-19 y de 10,59 casos por 1.000 ingresos COVID-19. Durante la pandemia se registraron 241 bacteriemias en 74 pacientes COVID-19 y en 167 pacientes no-COVID-19. La resistencia a meticilina se detectó en el 32,4% y 13,8% de los aislados de pacientes COVID-19 y no-COVID-19 respectivamente. En pacientes COVID-19 la mortalidad fue significativamente mayor. Conclusiones: Mostramos una incidencia significativamente alta de bacteriemias por S. aureus en pacientes COVID-19, así como mayores tasas de resistencia a meticilina y mortalidad a los 15 días que en pacientes no-COVID-19.
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study is to review how did the first three COVID-19 waves affected the diagnostic of tuberculosis and to describe the extra-pulmonary Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex (TB) diagnosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective observational study was done during the first three waves of pandemic to ascertain the impact on TB samples and to recover the extra-pulmonary TB cases we included the first two years of COVID-19. All relevant data was recovered from hospital and Clinical Microbiology records. RESULTS: Prepandemic period showed an average of 44 samples per week for TB study; during the first three waves this number dropped to 23.1 per week. A reduction of 67.7% of pulmonary TB diagnosis was observed and an increase of 33.3% diagnosis of extra-pulmonary TB was noted when comparing pre-pandemic and pandemic period. DISCUSSION: The number of declared cases and samples for TB diagnosis dropped during the first three COVID-19 waves due to the overstretched Public Health System which could lead to a delay in diagnosis, treatment and to the spread of TB disease in the general population. Surveillance programs should be reinforced to avoid this.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: The aim was to compare the incidence of Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia in COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 adult patients during the pandemic period versus the previous two years. Also, we described the characteristics of both cohorts of patients in pandemic period to find differences. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Retrospective study in our tertiary-care centre reviewing S. aureus bacteremia episodes in COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 patients through clinical records and the Microbiology Department database. RESULTS: In 2018 and 2019, the incidence of S. aureus bacteremia episodes was 1.95 and 1.63 per 1000 admissions respectively. In the pandemic period, global incidence was 1.96 episodes per 1000 non-COVID-19 admissions and 10.59 episodes per 1000 COVID-19 admissions. A total of 241 bacteremia was registered during this pandemic period in 74 COVID-19 patients and in 167 non-COVID-19 patients. Methicillin resistance was detected in 32.4% and 13.8% of isolates from COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 patients respectively. In COVID-19 patients, mortality rates were significantly higher. CONCLUSIONS: We showed a significantly high rates of S. aureus bacteremia incidence in COVID-19 patients and higher methicillin resistance and 15-day mortality rates than in non-COVID-19 patients.
Subject(s)
Bacteremia , COVID-19 , Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus , Staphylococcal Infections , Adult , Humans , Staphylococcus aureus , Retrospective Studies , COVID-19/epidemiology , SARS-CoV-2 , Staphylococcal Infections/microbiology , Bacteremia/epidemiology , Bacteremia/microbiologyABSTRACT
Introducción: el objetivo de este estudio fue revisar cómo afectaron las primeras tres olas de la pandemia COVID-19 al diagnóstico de tuberculosis y describir el diagnóstico de las infecciones extrapulmonares causadas por Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex (TB). Material y métodos: se realizó un estudio observacional y retrospectivo durante el periodo que incluye las tres primeras olas de la pandemia para valorar el impacto en las muestras de TB y para valorar el diagnóstico de las TB extrapulmonares se amplió el periodo de estudio para incluir los dos primeros años de la COVID-19. Todos los datos relevantes se extrajeron de la base de datos del hospital y del Servicio de Microbiología y Parasitología Clínica. Resultados: en el periodo prepandémico se recibían una media de 44 muestras por semana para el estudio de TB;durante las tres primeras olas ese número cayó a 23,1 por semana. Se observó una reducción del 67,7% en el diagnóstico de la TB pulmonar y un aumento del 33,3% en el diagnóstico de la TB extrapulmonar cuando se comparó con los datos prepandemia. Discusión: el número de casos declarados y el número de muestras para el diagnóstico de TB cayó durante las tres primeras olas del COVID-19 debido a la saturación del Sistema Nacional de Salud lo que podría llevar a un retraso en el diagnóstico, tratamiento y a un aumento de la transmisión en la población general. Los sistemas de vigilancia deberían reforzarse para evitar esto.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Invasive pulmonary aspergillosis (IPA) is a complication of respiratory bacterial and viral infections such as coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). PATIENTS/METHODS: In University Hospital La Paz (Madrid, Spain), we reviewed the clinical and demographic characteristics of 10 patients with positive severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) PCR and Aspergillus spp. isolate in respiratory samples. We also recovered results of galactomannan tests in serum and/or bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) samples. RESULTS: Eight male and two female from 51 to 76 years were recovered. They had reported risk factors to develop IPA (haematological malignancies, immunosuppression, diabetes, obesity, intensive care unit stay, among others). Azole susceptible Aspergillus fumigatus was isolated in nine patients and Aspergillus nidulans was isolated in one patient. Only one case was classified as probable aspergillosis, seven cases as putative aspergillosis, and two cases were not classifiable. Eight patients received antifungal treatment. Seven patients died (70%), two are still inpatient due to nosocomial infections and one was discharged referred to another institution. CONCLUSIONS: This clinical entity has high mortality, and therefore, it should be performed surveillance with early galactomannan tests and cultures in respiratory samples in order to improve the outcome of the patients with this condition.
ABSTRACT
The aim is determining the impact of non-pharmaceutical measures (NPIs) against SARS-CoV-2 in the incidence and prevalence of gastrointestinal viruses (GV) in children. Demographic, analytical, and clinical data of children from which samples were received at the Hospital Universitario La Paz (Madrid, Spain) and that had a gastrointestinal infection with a positive sample through multiplex-PCR for GV were collected. The time periods included were prepandemic (P1): March 14, 2019 to March 14, 2020 and pandemic (P2): March 15, 2020 to March 15, 2021. The global prevalence, relative incidence (RI, per 1,000 admissions) and absolute incidence (AI, per 100,000 population) of GV were compared for both time periods. The prevalence of GV versus SARS-CoV-2 was determined for P2. Seven-hundred and 50 out of 2,547 children analyzed in P1 and 106 out of 1,368 in P2 were positive by PCR for GV (46.3% decrease in P2). Prevalence and RI of GV declined in P2, except for the RI of rotavirus. Adenovirus showed the largest decreased of prevalence and RI (100%), followed by sapovirus. Astrovirus reduction was less pronounced (3.1% versus 0.4%). Norovirus was the most frequent virus in both time periods and its prevalence and RI also decreased in P2 (15.2% versus 4.7% and 3.40 versus 1.74, respectively). Rotavirus had the smallest decrease in prevalence (2.6% versus 2.5%), and its RI increased during P2 from 0.7 to 0.93. After removing the rotavirus vaccine strains from the analysis, the prevalence and RI decreased during P2 (2.1% to 0.7% and 0.5 to 0.3, respectively). The AI decreased during P2 in all GV, and the prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 and GV was inversely proportional over time. Prevalence and incidence of GV have decreased during the pandemic, probably due to the implementation of NPIs against this virus and the reduction of health care attention to infections other than COVID-19. The differences in the decrease of prevalence and incidence for each virus may be explained by differences in the transmission and the resistance in the environment. Prevalence and RI of rotavirus might be biased since the PCR used detects both the infecting and the vaccine strains. IMPORTANCE Our original article contains an analysis of the impact of the measures applied against SARS-CoV-2 on the prevalence and incidence of GV in children. The small number of studies published to date that analyze the impact of these measures individually on each of the GV makes our study of great interest at this time.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Communicable Diseases , Gastroenteritis , Gastrointestinal Diseases , Rotavirus , Viruses , COVID-19/epidemiology , Child , Communicable Diseases/epidemiology , Feces , Gastrointestinal Diseases/epidemiology , Humans , Incidence , Infant , Pandemics , Prevalence , Retrospective Studies , SARS-CoV-2/geneticsABSTRACT
Data from several cohorts of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) suggest that the most common comorbidities for severe COVID-19 disease are the elderly, high blood pressure, and diabetes; however, it is not currently known whether the previous use of certain drugs help or hinder recovery. This study aims to explore the association of previous hospitalisation use of medication on the mortality of COVID-19 disease. A retrospective case-control from two hospitals in Madrid, Spain, included all patients aged 18 years or above hospitalised with a diagnosis of COVID-19. A Propensity Score matching (PSM) analysis was performed. Confounding variables were considered to be age, sex, and the number of comorbidities. Finally, 3712 patients were included. Of these, 687 (18.5%) patients died (cases). The 22,446 medicine trademarks used previous to admission were classified according to the ATC, obtaining 689 final drugs; all of them were included in PSM analysis. Eleven drugs displayed a reduction in mortality: azithromycin, bemiparine, budesonide-formoterol fumarate, cefuroxime, colchicine, enoxaparin, ipratropium bromide, loratadine, mepyramine theophylline acetate, oral rehydration salts, and salbutamol sulphate. Eight final drugs displayed an increase in mortality: acetylsalicylic acid, digoxin, folic acid, mirtazapine, linagliptin, enalapril, atorvastatin, and allopurinol. Medication associated with survival (anticoagulants, antihistamines, azithromycin, bronchodilators, cefuroxime, colchicine, and inhaled corticosteroids) may be candidates for future clinical trials. Drugs associated with mortality show an interaction with the underlying conditions.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , Clinical Laboratory Techniques , Humans , Polymerase Chain Reaction , RNA, Viral/genetics , Viral LoadABSTRACT
The aim of this study is to review bacterial isolates from respiratory samples of patients with severe COVID-19 disease during the first 2 months of the first wave in our hospital. A single-center retrospective observational study in critically ill adult patients was performed. A total of 1251 respiratory samples from 1195 patients were processed. Samples from 66 patients (5.52%) were determined to be microbiologically significant by a semi-quantitative culture. All patients received broad spectrum antibiotherapy as an empirical treatment. The isolated bacteria were mainly Enterobacterales followed by Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Bacterial co-infections in ICU stay could seem not dependent on the virus that has produced the viral pneumonia similarly as with other respiratory viruses such as Influenza virus.
Subject(s)
COVID-19/complications , Coinfection/diagnosis , Pneumonia, Bacterial/complications , Tertiary Care Centers , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Cross Infection/drug therapy , Cross Infection/microbiology , Female , Humans , Intensive Care Units , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , SARS-CoV-2ABSTRACT
SARS-CoV-2 virus infects children but, contrary to other respiratory viruses, children tend to be asymptomatic or to have less symptoms than adults and are rarely the index case in household transmission chains. The aim of this study was to compare the relative viral loads in nasopharyngeal samples from children aged 0 to 17 years with those of an adult population. We selected 126 positive nasopharyngeal samples from children. Relative viral loads were measured by RT-PCR and the comparative ∆Ct method using primers and probes targeting the viral gene E and the human RNAseP. Relative viral loads were significantly lower in the children population than in the adult one.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , Adult , Child , Humans , Nasopharynx , Serologic Tests , Viral LoadABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Real-time reverse transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) is the reference laboratory method to diagnose SARS-CoV-2 infection then requires equipment and is time-consuming. There is a crucial demand for rapid techniques such as antigen detection test. Considering the different diagnostic accuracy of tests with other respiratory viruses in adults and children, SARS-CoV-2 antigen test must be evaluated specifically in children. METHODS: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the performance of Panbio COVID-19 Ag Rapid Test Device (Abbott) as a point-of-care test for diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 in comparison to RT-qPCR in a pediatric population. RESULTS: Four hundred forty nasopharyngeal swabs were tested. Amongst the 18 positive RT-qPCR samples, 14 were detected by the rapid antigen test, given an overall sensitivity of 77.7%. All the samples detected positive with the antigen rapid test were also positive with RT-qPCR. CONCLUSION: The sensitivity of Panbio COVID-19 Ag Rapid Test Device is lower in children than in adults. Nevertheless, considering the good values of specificity, negative and positive predictive values this test could be used as a frontline test to obtain quick results, although the negative values with COVID-19 high clinical suspicion should be confirmed using RT-qPCR.
Subject(s)
Antigens, Viral/isolation & purification , COVID-19 Nucleic Acid Testing , COVID-19 Serological Testing , COVID-19/diagnosis , SARS-CoV-2/isolation & purification , Adolescent , Child , Child, Preschool , Female , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Male , Point-of-Care Testing , Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction/methods , Sensitivity and SpecificityABSTRACT
Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) was first detected in Madrid, Spain, on 25 February 2020. It increased in frequency very fast and by the end of May more than 70,000 cases had been confirmed by reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). To study the lineages and the diversity of the viral population during this first epidemic wave in Madrid we sequenced 224 SARS-CoV-2 viral genomes collected from three hospitals from February to May 2020. All the known major lineages were found in this set of samples, though B.1 and B.1.5 were the most frequent ones, accounting for more than 60% of the sequences. In parallel with the B lineages and sublineages, the D614G mutation in the Spike protein sequence was detected soon after the detection of the first coronavirus disease 19 (COVID-19) case in Madrid and in two weeks became dominant, being found in 80% of the samples and remaining at this level during all the study periods. The lineage composition of the viral population found in Madrid was more similar to the European population than to the publicly available Spanish data, underlining the role of Madrid as a national and international transport hub. In agreement with this, phylodynamic analysis suggested multiple independent entries before the national lockdown and air transportation restrictions.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Two automatable in-house protocols for high-troughput RNA extraction from nasopharyngeal swabs for SARS-CoV-2 detection have been evaluated. METHODS: One hundred forty one SARS-CoV-2 positive samples were collected during a period of 10-days. In-house protocols were based on extraction with magnetic beads and designed to be used with either the Opentrons OT-2 (OT-2in-house) liquid handling robot or the MagMAXTM Express-96 system (MMin-house). Both protocols were tested in parallel with a commercial kit that uses the MagMAXTM system (MMkit). Nucleic acid extraction efficiencies were calculated from a SARS-CoV-2 DNA positive control. RESULTS: No significant differences were found between both in-house protocols and the commercial kit in their performance to detect positive samples. The MMkit was the most efficient although the MMin-house presented, in average, lower Cts than the other two. In-house protocols allowed to save between 350 and 400 for every 96 extracted samples compared to the commercial kit. CONCLUSION: The protocols described harness the use of easily available reagents and an open-source liquid handling system and are suitable for SARS-CoV-2 detection in high throughput facilities.